Contemporary language education operates within increasingly complex sociolinguistic environments shaped by migration, global mobility, multilingualism, large student cohorts, and growing informal exposure to English and other languages. Within these contexts, language classrooms are no longer isolated spaces but form part of broader learning ecologies in which formal instruction interacts with informal language use, digital media, and multicultural communicative practices.
This conference explores how language education can respond coherently and effectively to these conditions while maintaining a strong focus on interaction, learner engagement, motivation, and disciplinary communication. While English will feature prominently, the conference welcomes contributions addressing the teaching and learning of other languages, as well as multilingual and cross-linguistic perspectives. Particular attention will be paid to higher education contexts, where students are often required not only to learn languages but also to use them as tools for accessing, constructing, and communicating disciplinary knowledge.
In particular, the conference aims to explore the role of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) as a pedagogical framework capable of responding to the shifting dynamics of our globalised world. This is achieved by building on key international contributions (e.g., Ellis 2003, 2005, 2019; Erlam 2015; Erlam & Tolosa 2022; Long 1985, 2015a, 2015b, Prahbu 1987; Willis 1996), as well as on studies carried out in the Italian context (e.g., Borro 2021; Della Putta & Sordella 2022; Della Putta & Ghia 2025; Morgana 2023; Nuzzo & Cortés Velásquez 2018; Nuzzo & Ferrari 2011; Petrocelli 2021, 2025; Petrocelli, Pizziconi, Ghia & Di Ferrante 2022). Contributions may examine how task-based approaches can support learner engagement and motivation (e.g., Gutiérrez 2024), particularly in contexts where English is no longer positioned solely as a subject to be learned but functions as a lingua franca within multicultural settings, including informal, media-saturated environments (Pavesi & Ghia 2020, Pavesi et al. 2025).
At the same time, the conference seeks to place TBLT in dialogue with discipline-informed language education, exploring connections with established traditions and practices such as Language for Specific Purposes (LSP), Language for Academic Purposes (LAP) and Language for Specific Academic Purposes (LSAP) (Long 2015b; Serafini et al. 2015; Siddiqui & Winke 2023), English Medium Instruction (EMI) (Moore 2017), and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) (Nikula 2015; Ortega 2015; Ahmadian & García Mayo 2018; Petrocelli et al. 2022). These approaches raise important questions about how language teaching can support students in engaging with disciplinary knowledge, academic discourse, and specialised communicative practices.
The conference, therefore, welcomes contributions that investigate how task-based, discipline-informed pedagogical approaches are interpreted, adapted, and implemented in educational contexts characterised by mobility, multilingualism, and large student populations, both within and beyond higher education (Álvarez & Pérez Cavana 2015; Duong & Nguyen 2021; Liu & Ren 2021). Perspectives from teacher education and professional development in relation to task-based and discipline-informed approaches are also welcome.
The aim is to foster an inclusive dialogue on how language education can adapt to contemporary learning ecologies while remaining theoretically grounded and pedagogically purposeful.
Contributions may address, but are not limited to, the following questions:
- How can meaningful interaction be structured and sustained in large-enrolment language learning contexts?
- How can task-based approaches support learners’ and teachers’ engagement and motivation, especially in multilingual and multicultural classrooms?
- How can language education enable students to analyse, construct, and communicate disciplinary knowledge effectively?
- How can explicit and implicit dimensions of language learning be integrated within coherent curriculum design?
- How can TBLT be adapted to contexts characterised by mobility, migration, and diverse linguistic repertoires?
- How can task-based approaches be integrated with LSP, LAP, LSAP, EMI support, or CLIL practices?
- What role do informal language exposure and digital environments play in shaping task-based learning opportunities?
- What role does technology-mediated communication play in task-based design and implementation?
- How can language instructors interpret and respond to learning difficulties in multilingual classrooms shaped by migration and linguistic diversity?
- How can teacher education and professional development respond to the challenges of implementing TBLT and discipline-informed language education in multilingual and large-enrolment contexts?
We welcome theoretical, empirical, and practice-based contributions that address these issues across educational settings and sociolinguistic contexts.
References
Ahmadian, M.J. & García Mayo, M.d.P. (Eds.) (2018). Recent Perspectives on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Ahmadian, M.J., & Long, M.H. (Eds.) (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Álvarez, I. & Pérez Cavana, M. (2015). “Multilingual and Multicultural Task-based Learning Scenarios: A Pilot Study from the MAGICC Project. Language Learning in Higher Education. Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS) 5(1): 59–82.
Borro, I. (2021). “Comparing the effectiveness of TBLT and PPP on L2 grammar learning: a pilot study with Chinese students of Italian L2”. In M. Long & M.J. Ahmadian (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Della Putta, P., & Ghia, E. (2025). La focalizzazione sulla forma nell’apprendimento e nell’insegnamento delle lingue straniere: aspetti linguistici, psicolinguistici e glottodidattici. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.
Della Putta, P., & Sordella, S. (2022). Insegnare l’italiano a studenti neo arrivati. Un modello laboratoriale. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
Duong T.M., Nguyen H.T.T. (2021). “Implementing Task-based Language Teaching in Vietnamese Secondary Schools: What Hinders EFL Teachers?” TESL-EJ 25(2).
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford & New York: Oxford Applied Linguistics.
Ellis, R. (2005). “Principles of instructed language learning”. System 33(2): 209–224.
Ellis, R. (2019). “Towards a Modular Language Curriculum for Using Tasks. Language Teaching Research 23(4): 454–475.
Erlam, R. (2015). “‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers Designing Language Tasks”. Language Teaching Research 20: 279–299.
Erlam, R., & Tolosa, C. (2022). Pedagogical Realities of Implementing Task-based Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gutiérrez, X. (2024). “Implementation of Task-based Language Teaching in a Spanish Language Program: Instructors’ and Students’ Perceptions”. Language Teaching Research.
Liu, Y. & Ren, W. (2021). “Task-based Language Teaching in a Local EFL Context: Chinese University Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices”. Language Teaching Research.
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Long, M.H. (2015a). Second Language Acquisition and Task-based Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, M.H. (2015b). “The L in TBLT: Analyzing Target Discourse”. In M.J. Ahmadian & M.H. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–172.
Moore, P.J. (2017). “Unwritten Rules: Code Choice in Task-based EFL Learner Discourse in an EMI Context in Japan”. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English Medium of Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific: From Policy to Pedagogy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 299–320.
Morgana, V. (2023). Task-Based English Language Teaching in the Digital Age. Bloomsbury Academic.
Nikula, T. (2015). “Hands-on Tasks in CLIL Science Classrooms as Sites for Subject-specific Language Use and Learning. System 54: 14–27.
Nuzzo, E., & Cortés Velásquez, D. (Eds.). (2018). Il task nell’insegnamento delle lingue. Percorsi tra ricerca e didattica al CLA di Roma Tre. Roma: RomaTre-Press.
Nuzzo, E., & Ferrari, S. (2011). Insegnare la grammatica italiana con i task. In W. Paschetto & L. Corrà (Eds.), La Grammatica a Scuola: Quando? Come? Quale? Perché? Atti del XVI Convegno nazionale GISCEL (pp. 284–295). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Ortega, L. (2015). “Researching CLIL and TBLT Interfaces”, System 54: 103–109.
Pavesi, M. & Ghia, E. (2020). Informal Contact with English. A Case Study of Italian Postgraduate Students. Pisa: ETS.
Pavesi, M., Bianchi, F., Bruti, S. & Zago, R. (2025). In Contact with English. Informal Media-driven Learning among Italian University Students. Roma: Carocci.
Petrocelli, E. (2021). Pre-service teacher education: Observing senior teachers through the theoretical lens of Ellis’s principles of instructed language learning. E-JournALL: EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 8(1), 20–51.
Petrocelli, E., Pizziconi, S., Ghia, E. & Di Ferrante, L. (2022). “L’interdisciplinarità fa notizia. L’inglese tra STEAM, CLIL e task-based language teaching”. In C. Scognamiglio (a cura di), Convergenze inaspettate. Approcci interdisciplinari nell’era della didattica digitale. Roma: Stamen, 143–167.
Petrocelli, E. (2025). Project-Based Modular Designs in English Language Acquisition: Bridging Tasks, Structures, and Classroom Realities. Siena: Edizioni Università per Stranieri di Siena.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Serafini, E.J., Lake, J.B., & Long, M.H. (2015). “Needs Analysis for Specialized Learner Populations: Essential Methodological Improvements”. English for Specific Purposes 40: 11–26.
Siddiqui, T. & Winke, P. (2023). “Bangladeshi EAP Teachers’ Perspectives on Task-based Language Teaching”. TASK 3: 273–304.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.